ionicons-v5-h ionicons-v5-f ionicons-v5-f ionicons-v5-k ionicons-v5-a ionicons-v5-i ionicons-v5-e ionicons-v5-h ionicons-v5-l ionicons-v5-j ionicons-v5-g ionicons-v5-g ionicons-v5-i ionicons-v5-k ionicons-v5-g ionicons-v5-g

Your Proposal Does not Fit in Our Editorial Line : constructing a dissident researcher

In this article I discuss the possibility of and the necessity for dissident researchers in academia. I investigate the strategies of interruption as methods of engaging with the institution through artistic research and approaches. Art as a dissensual activity turns artistic research into a dissident research that can serve to question academic consensus rather than conforming to its established structure.
In order to construct a dissident researcher, I go through three short architectural narrations of three places: a prison (as discipline), a school of architecture (as artistic research) and a library (as dominant discourse). These three narrations are combined with three formulae: amateur, fiction, misperformance or disloyalty; each acts as certain characteristics of dissidence that are pertinent to an ongoing micro-project explained here. Together, these aim to raise the question: How does perceiving artistic research as dissident research modify conventional evaluation systems and set up new evaluating strategies based on politics of dissidence.
Gothenburg, Sweden, 2015
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-108300


Full spec

AccessDate
2021-12-06T15:08:06Z
ConferenceName
Transvaluation: May 21-22, 2015, Department of Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
DateAdded
2021-12-06T15:08:06Z
DateModified
2021-12-06T15:10:19Z
Key
Y4DX9JC3
Language
eng
LibraryCatalog
www.diva-portal.org
Rights
Closed
ShortTitle
Your Proposal Does not Fit in Our Editorial Line