ionicons-v5-h ionicons-v5-f ionicons-v5-f ionicons-v5-k ionicons-v5-a ionicons-v5-i ionicons-v5-e ionicons-v5-h ionicons-v5-l ionicons-v5-j ionicons-v5-g ionicons-v5-g ionicons-v5-i ionicons-v5-k ionicons-v5-g ionicons-v5-g

Research practices as strategic games : Clarifying differences in gameplay to support interdisciplinarity

There are many descriptions of interdisciplinarity and how to rate its success, but less research is done on why interdisciplinarity in joint research efforts fails. Explanations are often focused on the conceptual distance between research fields as the cause for communication problems. However, a more pragmatic explanation might be the interaction of participants’ different economic systems in the interdisciplinary setting. In this position paper I take a joint research project at the Department of Computer and Systems Sciences at Stockholm University and the Departmentof Architecture and the Built Environment at KTH, in collaboration with the Royal Institute of Art in Stockholm, as a case to discuss how to support interdisciplinarity by clarifying differences in gameplay between research fields.
Aarhus, 2015
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-123967


Full spec

AccessDate
2021-12-22T14:59:41Z
ConferenceName
I've had it! Group therapy for interdisciplinary researchers. Workshop associated withe the fifth decennial Aarhus conference, Critical Alternatives, Aarhus, Denmark, August 17-21, 2015
DateAdded
2021-12-22T14:59:41Z
DateModified
2021-12-22T15:00:17Z
Key
GIHJEL5X
Language
eng
LibraryCatalog
www.diva-portal.org
Rights
Closed
ShortTitle
Research practices as strategic games