ionicons-v5-h ionicons-v5-f ionicons-v5-f ionicons-v5-k ionicons-v5-a ionicons-v5-i ionicons-v5-e ionicons-v5-h ionicons-v5-l ionicons-v5-j ionicons-v5-g ionicons-v5-g ionicons-v5-i ionicons-v5-k ionicons-v5-g ionicons-v5-g

Your Proposal Doesn’t Fit in Our Editorial Line: Constructing a Dissident Researcher.

In this article I discuss the possibility of and the necessity for dissident researchers in academia. I investigate the strategies of interruption as methods of engaging with the institution through artistic research and approaches. Art as a dissensual activity turns artistic research into a dissident research that can serve to question academic consensus rather than conforming to its established structure.
In order to construct a dissident researcher, I go through three short architectural narrations of three places: a prison (as discipline), a school of architecture (as artistic research) and a library (as dominant discourse). These three narrations are combined with three formulae: amateur, fiction, misperformance or disloyalty; each acts as certain characteristics of dissidence that are pertinent to an ongoing micro-project explained here. Together, these aim to raise the question: How does perceiving artistic research as dissident research modify conventional evaluation systems and set up new evaluating strategies based on politics of dissidence?
Gothenburg, Sweden, 2015
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-195615


Full spec

AccessDate
2021-12-07T12:16:58Z
ConferenceName
International Symposium Transvaluation: Making the World Matter. Chalmers University, Gothenburg 21-22 May 2015
DateAdded
2021-12-07T12:16:58Z
DateModified
2021-12-07T12:17:33Z
Key
C25KKQG9
Language
eng
LibraryCatalog
www.diva-portal.org
Rights
Closed
ShortTitle
Your Proposal Doesn’t Fit in Our Editorial Line